The Path to Peace

After the First World War the winners punished Germany with exorbitant reparations and military occupation of the Rhineland.  Germany’s humiliation allowed a psychopathic regime control of the most productive and technologically advanced society in the world.

Twenty one years after the end of the First World War the Second World War started. Six years later Europe was wrecked.  This time, instead of punishing the belligerents they were supported.  The Marshall Plan provided substantial financial and practical support to rebuild the economies and societies of Europe and Japan.

It worked.

The First Gulf War of 1990 allowed a psychopathic terror group to attract funding and recruits.  The 9/11 attacks on New York started an escalation to the Second Gulf War and the ongoing “War on Terror”.  After 14 years of suffering death and destruction and of diminished civil liberties we seem to be further from rather than closer to peace.

To stop the war we have to break the cycle of grievance.

To stop the war we have to switch from punishment and slaughter to support and opportunity.

We need a “Marshall Plan” for the Middle East.

A flourishing, educated and successful middle class is less easily persuaded into acts of terror.

This is not the easy option.  It requires extraordinary leadership to change the conversation from belligerence to peace, from division to inclusion.  The fact that it is not happening is proof that currently we lack leadership of sufficient quality to inspire a change of heart and strategy.

Winston Churchill once said “Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip.”

This kind of “tact” is one of the key skills of great leaders.  The ability to inspire lobbyists, pundits, media and the people to do the right thing and not just the simplistic, populist, reactive thing.

There is a saying “Cometh the hour, cometh the man/woman”.

Another way of saying this is that once a crisis gets deep enough and all of the simplistic options have been tried the “social energy” for an alternate, positive solution increases and the opportunity emerges for a leader to guide the way.

It is up to us the followers to signal that change of “social energy”, when the clamour rises the leader will emerge.

We want peace not punishment.

We want prosperity not poverty.

We want a “Marshall Plan” for Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan at least.  We want leadership that is willing to take on the political, commercial, tribal and sectarian challenges and end the conflict.

Neil Crofts

Advertisements

About Neil Crofts

Writer, coach and consultant on authentic business and authentic leadership. Neil has inspired and motivated hundreds organisations and thousands of individuals to their highest potential. Neil has written three published books and numerous e-books. Neil is a coach, facilitator and consultant helping people and businesses find their authentic purpose and use it to inspire and motivate them to be everything that they can be. Neil has raced cars, been self-employed, run a company and sold it, been employed by large companies, experienced growth and contraction at the heart of the dotcom boom, tried changing companies from the inside and from the outside as European Head of Strategy at internet consultancy/rock band Razorfish. Neil has been independent for over 10 years and delivered his Authentic Leadership message to a diverse range of business audiences including people at BP, Shell, Microsoft, Kraft Foods, MSN, Jamie Oliver, South Gloucestershire Council, National Blood Transfusion Service, KaosPilots Business School, Fashion company By Malene Birger, German technology company Eleven.
This entry was posted in Leadership. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Path to Peace

  1. Nick Heap says:

    This is a genuinely new viewpoint and a possible way out of the mess we are in. Thanks, Neil.

  2. Neil Crofts says:

    Thank you Nick – please share as widely as you can.

  3. James Greer says:

    Great ideas – I do so love your thinking Neil. We need a Marshall Plan – yes please! But who is “we” and do those countries you speak of want a plan that might be felt to come from “us”? I thought Germany had to be defeated first, and the Nazi ideology destroyed, before anyone was ready for a plan for rebuilding? Thanks. James

    • Neil Crofts says:

      Well we could start with the easier places, like the estates in Belgium and Paris where extremism breeds, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan – if they were prosperous joining extremist gangs would be less attractive. Who are “we” anyone who chooses peace and prosperity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s