Cultural Pros and Cons

There are some things that are generically true about culture:

1 – Culture is as individual to an organisation as personality is to a person.  Every one is different.

2 – Every organisation has a culture – even if they have never considered it.

3 – Cultures can be effective and constructive as well as ineffective and destructive.

4 – Different types of business and even different parts of a business need different types of culture.

5 –  Above about 30 people culture needs deliberate nurturing if it is to be as effective as possible.

6 – Leadership and example are the biggest influences on culture.

Particular types of culture are more effective for different types of business.

Hierarchical vs Autonomous

A hierarchical culture is one where authority is more based on seniority, an autonomous culture is one where authority is more distributed.  Hierarchical organisations are most desirable when there is a relatively inexpert work force or in emergency situations.  Hierarchy is good for control when things are not otherwise ideal.  Hierarchy becomes a compromise when the situation is broadly good and the business needs to get the best out of people.  Individual motivation and effectiveness are significantly enhanced with autonomy.

Hierarchy and autonomy are mutually exclusive, so as a leader you might imagine operating a slide control between hierarchy and autonomy.  For maximum effectiveness you would want to keep moving the slider towards autonomy.  When thing are good and people have the required skills, push towards autonomy, always being prepared to step in hierarchically when people are out of their depth due to skills or emergency.   In most sectors look to increase skill and relax hierarchy over time to get the best out of people.

Caring vs Compliance

A caring culture is one where people are motivated to care about other people and the quality of output.  A compliance culture is one where people are motivated to obey the rules.  All organisations need a mixture of both, the question is one of calibration.  The important thing about compliance is that the rules are enforced.  If there are too many rules enforcement becomes expensive and counter productive.  Potentially high risk sectors need to have a higher degree of compliance culture than low risk sectors.  As a species we are genetically programmed to care, we find caring both motivating and rewarding.  In most cases the more opportunity we have to care the more effective we are.

As a leader, again, imagine you have a slide controller.  For maximum benefit you want the slider pushed as far towards “care” as you can, while balancing higher risk activities with regulation.  The more you can make rule compliance an act of caring (for team members safety for example)  rather than fear of consequences the more effective it will be.

Collaborative vs Competitive

A collaborative culture is one where everyone feels that they are working towards a common goal and can enroll others (customers and suppliers for example) in achieving that objective.  A competitive culture is one where goals are individual, even at the expense of colleagues, customers and suppliers.

Increasingly the very individual, destructive, ego based side of competitiveness is seen as undesirable – even in competition.  Sports teams, these days, appreciate their competitors excellence as helping them to improve.  In other words competitiveness is good as long as it is also collaborative.

In business we need to largely move on from “destructive” competition and towards collaborative cultures.  Rewards and conditions need to be structured so that sales people or business units are not competing with each other for resources or results, but are on the same side collaborating towards a shared objective.  We also need to move on from competing with suppliers and customers for profit.  Prioritising our own profits at the expense of our customer’s or our supplier’s is only ever effective in the short term.

Creative vs Conforming

A creative culture is one where process takes a back seat to innovation, a conforming culture is one where process is prioritized.  The choice of which is very dependent on what the business or team are doing.  The key is to be really clear about the objectives and to establish elements of creativity and conformity in the right places.

When I was at Razorfish, creativity was critical to everything we did – except that we also needed a common approach to delivering our creativity.  We had to have a process, framework and language that everyone conformed to, so that we could deliver creativity consistently.

As a leader you need to understand and clarify for others precisely where creativity and conformity are required.


This is a very simplified glance and the nature of organisational culture.  As a leader your priority is to understand and be very clear about the organisational vision and purpose and from that to identify what kind of culture is going to be the most effective at achieving them and then design the structure, rewards, processes and language that will nurture the desired culture.  When an organisation has less than about 30 people, this will happen fairly naturally, as the organization grows, especially if it is not in a single location more deliberate effort will need to be used to maintain the culture.

Please also visit the blog to comment

You can subscribe for free at

Become a fan on Facebook

Follow on Twitter

With love


Neil Crofts
authentic business
+34 646391384
Skype – neilcrofts


About Neil Crofts

Writer, coach and consultant on authentic business and authentic leadership. Neil has inspired and motivated hundreds organisations and thousands of individuals to their highest potential. Neil has written three published books and numerous e-books. Neil is a coach, facilitator and consultant helping people and businesses find their authentic purpose and use it to inspire and motivate them to be everything that they can be. Neil has raced cars, been self-employed, run a company and sold it, been employed by large companies, experienced growth and contraction at the heart of the dotcom boom, tried changing companies from the inside and from the outside as European Head of Strategy at internet consultancy/rock band Razorfish. Neil has been independent for over 10 years and delivered his Authentic Leadership message to a diverse range of business audiences including people at BP, Shell, Microsoft, Kraft Foods, MSN, Jamie Oliver, South Gloucestershire Council, National Blood Transfusion Service, KaosPilots Business School, Fashion company By Malene Birger, German technology company Eleven.
This entry was posted in Business, Leadership and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Cultural Pros and Cons

  1. Steve Prior says:

    Hi Neil

    It’s quite interesting to read some of the stuff that Deming did and said.

    He said for example that the system was responsible for 95% and humans for 5% of the performance of an organisation.

    By changing the system we change the behaviour of the people who are part of the system, in other words we change the culture.

    He moved people away from hard measurements and towards customer outcome. He moved organisations away from command and control to where the work was actually done ie the people at the coal face.

    On the face of it, this should be easy to do.

    Have a strong customer focused vision
    Manage people by giving them the autonomy to get the job done in the most effective way.

    Ricardo Semler at Semco based in Brazil (buy his books on Amazon) has taken it a stage or two further on. Amongst his initiatives is a completely open philosophy. People don’t work 9 to 5, they do what’s needed, they can move around between departments and get involved with things they enjoy.

    The fact that his company has grown massively and where people actually enjoy work is fascinating and I think proof that a better way is available for all of us.

    I’m fully convinced that collaboration is the best and only way to go. So much of the working world is based on an old model (command and control) with hard measurements and hard targets which needs to change. In fact I would argue that much of the western world is based on a terrible destructive and useless model that is counter to our natural growth.



  2. 7theaven says:

    A very interesting read

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s